The following is
worthy of note as it is a direct argument with the religious
leaders regarding Jesus' substance, being and identity and
so, in context, it deals with the very nature of Jesus.
Jhn 10:33 The
Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but
for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself
God. "Here
Jesus is accused (falsely though) of making himself God."
Jhn 10:34 Jesus
answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are
gods?
"Jesus answers his false accusers by refering to Psalm 82
and says that even God referred to humans as gods"
Jhn 10:35 If he
called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
scripture cannot be broken; "These "gods" were even the subject of God's
animosity and they are still gods"
Jhn 10:36 Say
ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of
God? "Here
he clarifies what he really said (and not what they were accusing
him of saying) that he is the Son of The God" How
much clearer can God's word make it.